|
 |
|
| |
Virginia
Beach | Ypsilanti | Oakville,
Ontario | Chicago | Romulus |
|
 |
| |
Automotive Case Studies
One
of the Big Three automobile manufacturers
Virginia Beach, VA –
10 Acres
Project Scope: One of
the Big Three auto manufacturers had been leasing multiple off-site parking areas,
making inventory management difficult. The costs of transporting vehicles between
sites plus the expenses of additional damage, inspection and security were high.
Alternative permanent sites were found to be cost prohibitive, with permitting
requiring one to two years.
TemPark Advantage: Because
of its soil characteristics, the local county’s former ten-acre landfill could
not be developed in other ways. Because of TemPark’s permeability, the land was
successfully re-purposed. And, compared to the off-site leasing, TemPark cut
the company’s costs by more than 30 percent. Imagine turning trash into treasure... Ford’s
a fan > [top]
|
 |
| |
A
10-Acre Comparison
Gravel vs. TemPark at Virginia Beach |
|
| |
 |
Gravel |
 |
TemPark™ |
|
| Time |
|
|
|
|
| Engineer |
|
3 Weeks |
|
3 Days |
| Permit Review Process |
|
6 Weeks |
|
2 Weeks |
| Engineer |
|
9 Weeks |
|
2 Weeks |
|
| TOTAL |
|
17 Weeks |
|
4
Weeks, 3 Days |
|
| Cost* |
|
|
|
|
| Survey/Storm Water |
|
$32,750 |
|
TemPark hard cost
was less than gravel |
| Erosion
Control |
|
16,750 |
|
|
| Top Soil
Strip |
|
96,120 |
|
|
| Find Grade |
|
75,000 |
|
TemPark was reinstalled
at another site and client recovered over 50% of material cost* |
| Retention
Basin |
|
45,000 |
|
|
| Ditching |
|
40,000 |
|
|
| Culverts,
Basins, Outlets |
|
25,000 |
|
|
| Gravel (6") |
|
216,000 |
|
|
| Seeding |
|
20,000 |
|
Site was returned
to nature with minimal intrusion |
|
| TOTAL |
|
$566,620 |
|
|
| *Comparison costs and
percentages acurate on date compiled. |
 |
|
|
 |
| |
Another
one
of the Big Three automobile manufacturers
Ypsilanti, MI – 100 Acres
Project Scope: Customer had leased multiple off-site parking areas, complicating
inventory management. Costs were high based on transportation of vehicles between
sites plus the additional expenses of inventory damage, inspection, and security.
Permanent sites were evaluated and found cost-prohibitive with permitting to
take 1-2 years.
TemPark Advantage: As
a full turnkey project, TemPark consolidated 10 sites into 1. TemPark procured
the site, performed full soil testing/engineering, designed the solution and
delivered the completed project ahead of schedule and under budget. Permitting
was completed in 60 days. Customer saved 50% of hard costs.
Ford’s
a fan > [top] |
 |
 |
 |
|
Another of the
Big Three automobile manufacturers
Oakville, Ontario,
Canada –
57 Acres
Project Scope: This
customer wanted to single-source project based off a vendor’s
core competency to deliver a turnkey parking area. Because of Canadian
zoning restrictions, no other resource was able to provide
both site procurement and complete permitting for a permanent facility.
TemPark
Advantage: The TemPark
team found this 57-acre site and successfully completed all permitting.
A completely turnkey solution, the cost of this project was able
to be 100% expensed as tax deduction immediately as opposed to the
long-term amortization of a permanent site improvement. [top] |
 |
 |
 |
|
Another
of the Big Three automobile manufacturers
Chicago, IL –
25 Acres
Project Scope: Multiple off-site
locations created the typical inventory management headaches and
transportation costs – plus the additional expenses of inventory
damage, inspection and security.
TemPark Advantage: By
consolidating the capacity of multiple sites into a single, secure
area, TemPark saved cash. [top] |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Hayes
Wheels
Romulus, MI –
1 Acre
Project Scope: Asphalt considered too expensive.
TemPark Advantage: TemPark
designed a high-quality solution that was saved 80% of the cost of asphalt – in
radically less time. [top] |
 |
| |
|
|